Hi,
On 2/23/06, Daglian, Michael (IT) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, right! Now I see. No matter how many times I've been through the
> spec I always seem to miss some details. :) This makes sense though as
> the mixin declared as a supertype cannot really be 'removed' as it forms
> part of the primary node type. The mixin would still be discoverable via
> the NodeType API though.
Exactly. You should also be able to use Node.isNodeType("mix:type") to
check for a mixin supertype.
> Will do. Just need to factor it down to a small test case to ensure that
> the problem isn't on my end. Thanks again!
Cool, thanks.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--
Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
