On 3/3/06, Thomas Heute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think there are use cases to keep history *and* to "forget" history. > > What would be nice is to let do both. > > Even though it can be done by ourself, there is a performance issue with > that.
I cannot agree more! That said, if i am the only one who needs that, it does not worth the pain. > > I do not think that you are the only one that needs that. I will see awesome to have the choice to explicitly tell Jackrabbit if he should copy/do not copy the version history of a node hierarchy. Martin
