hi jeremi jeremi joslin wrote:
I will start it maybe this week end.
Why you don't want to had this functionnalities to the simple webdav server? We will not broke anything, and maybe ...
i don't have anything against having the simple server being deltaV enabled :)) the reason for only having webdav 1,2 compliance lever was that up to now i had no need for additional stuff and nobody asked for it... that's it. > ... if you want we can > disable each extensions on the configuration file. what would be the usecase for having the configuration? a server being deltaV enabled can happily deal with a level1,2 client, can't it?
I will work first on the document versioning (http://www.webdav.org/deltav/), and after the right management (http://www.webdav.org/acl/).
oh. regarding rfc 3744... there is a jira issue for this http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-350, since the dav library is currently missing support for 3744. i have to admit, that i'm already done with issue JCR-350 (at least in an initial version), but i didn't commit it yet, because it would have made it hard to separate the changes that go into 1.0 from new stuff :)). regards angela
