> What was confusing me was your statement that, to quote: > "... of course locking can easily be part of a global transaction." > Now you agree that this is not the case. not even remotely. i agree that the operations in jackrabbit that are in "commit" have to be moved to "prepare". no relation to locking or the jcr api.
> It was by no means my intention to waste your time, so please > accept my apology. I was just reasoning about how transactions > should be used in jackrabbit. A big thanks to Dominique for > the transaction stuff as it is really hard to tackle it down. > To quote you once again: "... case closd." ;-) agreed ;) regards, david
