[ was: Re: Getting "custom" objects from the repository? ] hi christophe,
thanks for your comment this all sounds very interesting and is probably all worth individual threads. so let me start with this one ;) > Just some other words to clarrify Graffito goals : > 1. Provide a object mapping on the different repository technologies > (now mainly for JCR :-) ) sounds very interesting. however, schouldn't jcr serve as such an abstraction layer? that's certainly one of the design goals of jsr-170. of course i realize that the market adoption is not comparable to jdbc (yet ;) ), but translated into the realm of databases this sounds to me like providing java database connectivity via jdbc "and others ;)" rather than providing a (minimal) jdbc driver for those "other databases". am i completely mistaken? regards, david
