[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-132?page=all ]

Jukka Zitting updated JCR-132:
------------------------------

      Component: config
        Summary: BindableRepositoryFactory requires exact resource type  (was: 
Too BindableRepositoryFactory)
    Description: 
The org.apache.jackrabbit.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory class requires the 
exact class name org.apache.jackrabbit.jndi.BindableRepository to be specified 
for the JNDI resource that the factory is responsible for. However the current 
deployment model 2 howto document suggest that the more generic interface name 
javax.jcr.Repository be used instead. Currently this suggested configuration 
results in a null JNDI resource .

This issue should be fixed by either fixing the documentation (I can do this) 
or by relaxing the code in BindableRepositoryFactory. I'll attach a patch that 
does the latter, please comment on what you think is the best solution.

This issue was detected during the mailing list thread
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01324.html


  was:

    Environment: JNDI  (was: )
       Priority: Trivial  (was: Major)

> BindableRepositoryFactory requires exact resource type
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JCR-132
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-132
>      Project: Jackrabbit
>         Type: Wish
>   Components: config
>  Environment: JNDI
>     Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>     Priority: Trivial

>
> The org.apache.jackrabbit.jndi.BindableRepositoryFactory class requires the 
> exact class name org.apache.jackrabbit.jndi.BindableRepository to be 
> specified for the JNDI resource that the factory is responsible for. However 
> the current deployment model 2 howto document suggest that the more generic 
> interface name javax.jcr.Repository be used instead. Currently this suggested 
> configuration results in a null JNDI resource .
> This issue should be fixed by either fixing the documentation (I can do this) 
> or by relaxing the code in BindableRepositoryFactory. I'll attach a patch 
> that does the latter, please comment on what you think is the best solution.
> This issue was detected during the mailing list thread
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01324.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to