On 6/28/05, Simon Gash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What is everyone doing about the non-JSR 170 parts of JackRabbit. I > think there was already a mention of a commons type area. I'm trying to > remove all JackRabbit references from my solution but I've got a bunch > left behind. I was hoping to be able to get to the situation where I can > just swap out JSR170 repositories is this going to be possible ?
if you stick to the JCR api (javax.jcr.*) you should be safe. what jackrabbit references do you have? stefan > > > > My plan for now, was to hide them behind a common interface of my own > design but will there be enough commonality between implementations for > this to work. Any ideas welcome... > > > > Thanks > > > > Simon > > > Come visit us at: > > Government Computing Expo. June 21 & 22, Earls Court, Stand # 804 > > SOCITM Annual Event. October 16 - 18 Brighton Hotel, Stand # 28 > GOSS - Ranked 4th in the Deloitte Technology Fast 50 Awards 2004 and 88th in > the Deloitte Technology Fast 500 EMEA. > > This email contains proprietary information, some or all of which may be > legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If an addressing > or transmission error has misdirected this email, please notify the author by > replying to this email. If you are not the intended recipient you may not > use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email. > > > > Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free, as > information may be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or > incomplete or contain viruses. This email and any files attached to it have > been checked with virus detection software before transmission. You should > nonetheless carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. > GOSS Interactive Ltd accepts no liability for any loss or damage that may be > caused by software viruses. > > > >
