On 7/14/05, Julien Viet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you disable the cache then you reload everything all the time and > should achieve the desired effect, but performances will suffer a lot. > > By the way I disabled the cache in jackrabbit (I simple modified the > code to have the SharedItemCache have the put() do a noop). > > Some tests were not passing with that change. I think it is not normal > to have the tests failing when the cache is disabled (even if it > is uses a hack to make it not effective)
what would you expect if you'd mess around at the very core of a repository/rdbms? > > Marcel Reutegger wrote: > > > Julien Viet wrote: > > > >> because jackrabbit uses an internal cache that you cannot disable. > > > > > > and even if you would be able to disable the cache, one instance had > > to tell the other one that something has changed on disc. otherwise > > you would have to scan the filesystem all the time for possible changes. > > > > clustering is not that easy ;) > > > > regards > > marcel > > > > > -- > Julien Viet > JBoss Portal Lead Developer > >
