hi jim, > Prof Mazzochi sounds 'way off' ;-) , well, so be it ;) i just thought that something like this could address michaels idea of the bi-directional references.
> but thats how I've seen references - as the way to encode RDF. I forget how > far we backed off in the final spec, but the idea of including a "following' > clause in the query language was a way to let you query along graphs. agreed. with respect to query languages we certainly have the liberty to extend beyond the spec in jackrabbit. but maybe jcr:deref() is what you were looking for. > I don't think there's as clean a way to deal with all of RDF (e.g. reification > (statements about statements), anonymous nodes), but I think references > could work reasonably well for general triples. sounds reasonable to me.... regards, david
