Hi, On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 19:21 +0300, Jukka Zitting wrote: > Hi, > > Tobias wrote: > > well, i can't see another nice way of doing this. so maybe a common > > source directory would be the easiest solution. however, we should > > also check the new features of maven 2.0 in respect of multiproject > > capabilities: > > The Maven 2.0 option sounds interesting. Great if you can take some time > to experiment with it. If it works out fine, I'd be happy to go along, > otherwise we can fall back to the old model. > > About the ABS proposal: While the project seems interesting, it seems to > be too premature for our needs. Even if Maven hasn't got a good answer > to all our needs, it still covers many of them most excellently. In my > opinion the multiproject problem is nowhere near grave enough to warrant > considering a switch from Maven. OK, I understand you but ABS isn't a premature project, ABS is based on Jakarta Ant, and Ant is very stable ;-)
Thanks for your response,
Jérôme.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
--
The ABS team.
« Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow »
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ABS ~ Advanced Build System ~
~ Next Generation Build System ...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
