Hi John,
Day Software is the maintainer of the TCK. The current test code in
trunk of jackrabbit is *not* the official TCK! The official TCK can be
downloaded from the jsr-170 download page on jcp.org:
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr170/index.html
regards
marcel
John Newton wrote:
The appeals process suggests sending the appeal to the maintainer of the TCK.
The maintainer is also supposed to be responsible for interpretations.
Who is the maintainer? We thought it was Jackrabbit. Is it Day? Is it a
specific person?
TIA for your help
John Newton
Alfresco.org
Top Floor, Park House, Park Street
Maidenhead, Berks SL6 1SL
United Kingdom
Click here for map
+44 7890 270 532 (M)
+44 1628 860 500 (P)
+44 1628 860 501 (F)
+44 1628 860 639 (D)
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcel Reutegger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 September 2005 01:23
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug in NodeReadMethodsTest.java?
Hi David,
thanks for reporting this issue, this is clearly a bug in the test code.
I've fixed it as you suggested (svn revision: 289176)
> I assume this is the place to report this kind of problem.
yes it is, though if you feel a test case should be exclude from the
official TCK (1.0) because it poses a problem for your implementation,
you should follow the appeals process as defined by the JCP. We just
host the test code here in jackrabbit.
regards
marcel
David Caruana wrote:
The testGetIndex() test searches for a node with same name siblings
somewhere in the repository. It seems it will only find that node, if:
1) The node is the one identified by the test config value
javax.jcr.tck.NodeReadMethodsTest.testroot
2) Its first child is one of the same name siblings
It's possible that people may be mislead in that they believe the test
has passed, but in fact, their same name siblings were never found.
The method locateNodeWithSameNameSiblings(Node node) within
NodeReadMethodsTest.java looks like the culprit:
1011 } else {
1012 Node returnedNode = locateNodeWithSameNameSiblings(n);
1013 if (n != null) {
1014 return returnedNode;
1015 }
1016 }
line 1013 should be if (returnedNode != null) {
Changing to the above has allowed me to execute the test without messing
around with my test data.
I assume this is the place to report this kind of problem.
Regards,
David Caruana
www.alfresco.org
