Hi Doug,
makes sense to me to change the test case. Though the spec is imo not
100% clear about this. But I don't see a reason why an implementation
shouldn't be allowed to use a subtype of nt:query.
changed as suggested, svn revision: 293273
thanks for reporting this issue.
regards
marcel
McComsey, Doug wrote:
I am failing this TCK test:
org.apache.jackrabbit.test.api.query.SaveTest.testSave
One of the checks is to insure that the query node is of type nt:query:
assertEquals("Query node is not of type nt:query",
ntQuery, queryNode.getPrimaryNodeType().getName());
I would like to suggest that it be:
assertTrue("Query node is not of type nt:query",
queryNode.isNodeType(ntQuery));
I fail this test because my node definition is not nt:query but instead has
nt:query as a supertype. I would pass the suggested test.
Doug McComsey
Computer Associates
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
