On 10/20/05, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #: Stefan Guggisberg changed the world a bit at a time by saying on > 10/20/2005 3:03 PM :# > > hi alex, > > > > On 10/20/05, Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I was wondering if the bdb-contrib author/mentainers are considering to > >> upgrade it to 2.0.83. As > >> pointed in the changelog of this version [1] there are quite a few > >> benefits for doing it, and the > >> API changes are minimal (at least this is the first impression :-)). > > > > does the code need to be changed? did you try using the current > > implementation > > with the berkeleydb 2.0.83 jar? if there are any changes required in > > current code > > please send a patch. > > > > the bdb dependency in the project.xml refers to version 1.7.1 as this > > is the most recent > > version available on ibiblio. > > > > cheers > > stefan > > > > Should I read in the above that I am encouraged to try this out? In case it > is a successful try > should I understand that you might be considering it? I am just trying to set > my priorities ;-).
i tried to encourage you to try using berkleydb je 2.0.83 with the current BerkeleyDBPersistenceManager implementation and report your findings. i would assume that version 2.0.83 is backwards compatible with version 1.7.1 so there would be no changes in the code required. as for the dependency in the project.xml: i will update it to point to a newer berkeleydb je release as soon as there's one available on http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/berkeleydb/jars/. cheers stefan > ./alex > -- > .w( the_mindstorm )p. > > >> > >> What do you guys think about this? > >> > >> ./alex > >> -- > >> .w( the_mindstorm )p. > >> > >> [1] http://www.sleepycat.com/je_update/2.0.83/if.2.0.83.html > >> > > > >
