Brian Moseley wrote:
what's the right solution to the problem? one suggestion has been to move to a 2-character hashing scheme, which would guarantee fewer than 32k directories at each level. is this workable? is there a better solution?
i forgot to mention that we're currently using the xml PM. i checked the object PM and it uses 2 characters rather than 4, so i'm recommending to my ops guys that they switch to it. so i guess my specific problem is solved, but the issue should be considered for all of the filesystem based PMs.
