the concern is more about :
is INFO appropriate for that kind of logging ? shouldnt it be DEBUG rather ?
Tobias Bocanegra wrote:
hi roland,
simple answer: you can't. the observation is triggered asynchronously.
synchronous, vetoable observation will be part of the discussion for
jsr283.
what is the need for this? for simple constaints, you can use the
constraints in the property definition.
regards, toby
On 11/21/05, Roland Kofler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We tried to vetoing a propery change by throwing an exception in the
callback. Doesn't work. how do you veto in Jackrabbit?
thanks
Roland
--
-----------------------------------------< [EMAIL PROTECTED] >---
Tobias Bocanegra, Day Management AG, Barfuesserplatz 6, CH - 4001 Basel
T +41 61 226 98 98, F +41 61 226 98 97
-----------------------------------------------< http://www.day.com >---
--
Julien Viet
JBoss Portal Lead Developer
