No. It is not available standalone. But someone on this list posted some weeks ago info about an open source eclipse-based JCR browser. It was pretty good.
And, I know that hibernate != Jackrabbit. I was talking about "backends" not about products. I hope noone took my words as a products comparison. Kind regards, Martin On 1/11/06, Roy Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Congrats. > > Is your JCR Browser available standalone (without your Jlibrary stuff)? > > BTW, Hibernate != Jackrabbit. > > STAY METAL! > Roy Russo > JBoss Portal Developer > o: 404-442-2056 x1223 > c: 678-661-1760 > AIM: geekjava > http://jboss.org/jbossBlog/blog/rrusso/ > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Martin Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 12:53 PM > >To: jackrabbit-dev@incubator.apache.org > >Subject: [announce] Jackrabbit based Open Source DMS: jLibrary > > > >First of all, my apologizes if someone considers that this is > >not the best site to inform about this. But, I thought, that > >being an open source document management system application, > >and being based on jackrabbit maybe it could of interest for someone. > > > >I have released jLibrary 1.0beta4 > >(http://jlibrary.sourceforge.net , > >http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/jlibrary ). Well, I'm not > >going to talk here about the features, possibilities, use > >cases, bla bla bla. If you want to see it, simply browse to > >the web. I'm going to post simply comments about the project > >that maybe some could find useful, and so this post won't be > >only marketing spam :D > > > >* Apache jackrabbit has fulfilled all my expectactives and > >even more. When first I choose it to replace my old backend, I > >never had thought of such stability, performance, and > >robustness. The change has been really a good surprise and a > >great experience. > > > >* I have migrated jLibrary from a > >hibernate+ehcache+lucene+filters(poi,pdfbox,textmining) to a Jackrabbit > >based backend. It has been a really success. Hibernate was a > >really nightmare in comparison to jackrabbit. All that nasty > >session management, all the persistence work done by hand, .. > >people, believe me, if you want a hibernate based backend that > >suits good to a repository managed architecture, then, do the > >change! The performance, is, for my tests, much better. I can > >assure from this fact that jackrabbit is faster than > >hibernate, it would be an idiot if I said that. But I can say > >that for my case, it runs faster. > > > >* I had the honour to contribute some text filters to > >jackrabbit. Those text filters were originaly on jLibrary and > >now I have externalized them to Jackrabbit. I hope to do more > >contributions as I have liberated many stress with this release :) > > > >* The WebDAV server works fine for me. jLibrary uses it, and I > >have tried several webdav clients. Well, it isn't the better > >WebDAV client on the world as it has been discussed on this > >mailing list, but it do the simple work. > > > >* The most important problem I'm facing currently is that some > >text filtering process are really slow. Specifically, PDFBox > >library is really slow, and so when someone tried to index a > >file, the index process takes some time. Marcel did a great > >hack on this to avoid jackrabbit freezing on node indexing. I > >think that the bug that makes jackrabbit to index four! > >times a document has not been solved yet, but I think that > >with the recent system index externalization it will be solved soon. > > > >Well, I think that I have no more to say. Thanks to the > >jackrabbit team for the help. I will continue to spamize this > >mailing list as I want to release a final version concurrently > >with Jackrabbit final version. I hope you like jLibrary as > >much as I like Jackrabbit. > > > >Regards, > > > >Martin > > >
