Hi, The issue JCR-215 proposes to use the SLF4J logging facade in Jackrabbit instead of directly using log4j. The issue has been on hold waiting for a stable version of SLF4J.
SLF4J is getting very close to a 1.0 release (now in release candidate 5), so I'm thinking that we might perhaps want to make the log4j->slf4j switch before the 1.0 release. This would avoid the trouble of changing the logging framework between future Jackrabbit releases. Unless anyone objects, I'll tag JCR-215 for the 1.0 release and prepare for making the switch once SLF4J 1.0 is out. PS. See the links in JCR-215 for backround and reasons for making the switch. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
