On 1/18/06, Brian Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/18/06, Stefan Guggisberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > btw: i would argue that a content model with 30'000 child nodes could > > probably > > be optimized. > > ou seem to be implying that it is incorrect for a node to have a large > amount of children. why is that incorrect? is there a rule of thumb on > how many children a node can support in a well design content model? >
there's no general rule of thumb but since jcr's model is inherently hierarchical personally i would try to make use of this feature when designing a content model.