[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-309?page=comments#action_12364607 ] 

Tobias Bocanegra commented on JCR-309:
--------------------------------------

ok. lets add the register nodetype. but i would prefer an 
'org.xml.sax.InputSource' instead of the input stream. and maybe an additional 
content type:

public NodeType[] NodeTypeManagerImpl.registerNodeTypes(InputSource in, String 
contentType);

contentType is either: text/xml or text/cnd

the advantage of the inputsource is: it has a systemId that can be used to 
resolve entities (eg: relatvie DVDs), and also for better error reporting.



> Extract the public API interfaces from o.a.j.core to o.a.j.api
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: JCR-309
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-309
>      Project: Jackrabbit
>         Type: Task
>   Components: API
>     Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>      Fix For: 1.0
>  Attachments: jackrabbit-api.patch
>
> To better document and track the public JCR extensions and component API 
> provided by Jackrabbit and to allow more room for refactoring within the 
> Jackrabbit core, we shoud move (or create) the supported API interfaces to a 
> new org.apache.jackrabbit.api package.
> At least the following interfaces should be moved along with any supporting 
> implementation-independent classes:
>     * PersistenceManager
>     * FileSystem
>     * AccessManager
>     * QueryHandler
>     * TextFilter
> Possible dependencies to implementation-specific classes should preferably be 
> abstracted using extra interfaces.
> Also the workspace and node type administration methods should be published 
> as Jackrabbit-specific extensions to the JCR API interfaces.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to