On 2/3/06, Chandresh Turakhia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I do agree. Partly because JSR 170 is marketed as 'JDBC for Content' :) > > Perception of Jackrabbit is something that stores ""smartly"" & reliabily > content in database > Supports ''Content-oriented interface'' like EMB ( Enterprise Media Bean > JSR 086). JBoss does support EMB. > > Simple Business Executive / Sponsor Brief for Content Projects : > "Architecturally Content Applications like CMS uses 'EMB' to save > content to 'ContentBase' using JCBC ( Java ContentBase Connectivity) i.e. > JCR" > " May use industry MPEG 21 framework for content interobility with our > partners" > > Oracle Semantic Web, XML DB and Intermedia are great stuff but propriety tag > lingers and tough to get into mainstream applications :( > > Q1) People would appreciate DBPersistenance subclass for Oracle which uses > the db features to the best. Has someone done similiar work ? > > Q2) Also DBA does not appreciate the whole idea of all the content going in > just 1 big gigantic table. :(( How to get Content database refactored ? > > Q3) Has someone try to model MPEG 21 Content Model on top of JackRabbit / > 170 model. BRICK ( www.brickcommunity.org ) does something like that. All of > sudden JCR 170 become mainstream media technology :) > > Chand
huh?
