Brian, then that filter would be clearly a better solution! Just what I did not want to do was to directly patch WebDAV code.
Martin On 2/4/06, Brian Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/4/06, Miro Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My idea is that rather than try to build support for such > > application-specific logic into jackrabbit / JCR, which I would > > definitely oppose, how about building a hook either into jackrabbit > > itself or into the webdav code that allows a custom filter to be applied > > when getting child nodes or properties. This could allow support for > > different kinds of similar behaviour without breaking the main benefit > > of jackrabbit IMO, which is that it doesn't try to do too much, and so > > does what it does well. > > you're in luck. this hook already exists in the simple webdav server, > in the form of the ResourceFilter interface. >
