[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-363?page=comments#action_12371087 ]
Jukka Zitting commented on JCR-363: ----------------------------------- OK, thanks. I'll merge it in 1.0 on the basis of JSR 170 compliancy. If it does cause a problem, then we can always release a fix in 1.0.1. I'd rather err with a bug in 1.0 than an API compliancy issue, especially as the change seems to work just fine for me as well. > Node.setProperty(String, ...) implementation not according to the > specification > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JCR-363 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-363 > Project: Jackrabbit > Type: Bug > Components: API > Versions: 0.9 > Environment: svn r387181 > Reporter: Stefan Guggisberg > Assignee: Stefan Guggisberg > Fix For: 1.0 > > to illustrate the issue assume the following property definition: > name: someText > type: String > non-mandatory > non-autocreate > the following call would throw a ConstraintViolationException > if the property doesn't exist yet: > node.setProperty("someText", 12345); > the rules used to find an applicable definition in this case are too strict. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
