Since I have not heard anything, I think I will proceed with merging this for 2.10 as suggested
-+ Tatu +- On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:08 PM Marcos Passos <marcospassos....@gmail.com> wrote: > > We’ve been using this pattern for three months now, and we’ve noticed a > considerable improvement since we broke up large packages into smaller ones. > Currently, Jackson modules can only declare soft-dependencies which is a bad > experience from a developer perspective: you only notice that a dependency is > missing at runtime, when in fact they should never have to care about it in > the first place. > > - Marcos > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 21:17 Tatu Saloranta <t...@fasterxml.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:44 PM Marcos Passos >> <marcospassos....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi folks! >> > >> > I've opened a PR that introduces the possibility of declaring modules >> > dependencies to ensure the object mapper will register the required module >> > as well. >> > >> > In our case, we've several modules that depend on the Jdk8Module. We also >> > have modules that depend on other modules, e.g.: >> > >> > Module A depends on Jdk8Module >> > Module B depends on Module A and Jdk8Module >> > Module C depends on Module B and Jdk8Module >> > >> > >> > When you split the serialization modules into fine-grained modules, it's >> > much easier to declare the dependencies at the module level rather than >> > requiring the dependency every time you have to use it. >> > >> > Please, feel free to leave your comments about the proposal. >> >> I am hoping to hear from anyone interested, who has had challenges in >> maintaining (custom) modules; or who otherwise has opinions on this. >> Part of the reason I am eager to hear about this relatively soon is >> that I am hoping to close work on 2.10 -- 2.10.0.pr2 should be >> released within next 4-5 days, and although this is not a deadline for >> all work, additions beyond pr2 will get less testing and may face more >> scrutiny. Proposed change itself is quite safe but assuming this seems >> like a feature of interest to others I would like to get API somewhat >> right. >> >> -+ Tatu +- >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "jackson-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CAL4a10hK18ZtjEmaSJuPHyp7VHNm_62z0oUgoz3tnWfzO35LeA%40mail.gmail.com. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "jackson-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CANA3Des09%3D3FCRi8sQk5Yk4us-Qk0JYHzJi%3DdXrAgDyBPhqhKg%40mail.gmail.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CAL4a10jEknQyAGYvHzhNt6jw9gTG7Cr8-j-dveFB986ysh837g%40mail.gmail.com.
