So, as per https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-core/issues/1117
I think it is time to change the default `RecyclerPool` implementation (mechanism added in 2.16) to something other than the legacy implementation (which is based on a combination of ThreadLocal and SoftReference). So far so good, but which one? Implementations that we have can be seen in `com.fasterxml.jackson.core.util.JsonRecyclerPools` and include 1. ThreadLocal-based pool (`threadLocalPool()`): current default, uses `ThreadLocal` to hold on to reference to `BufferRecycler` (via `SoftReference`). Has multiple issues (but I won't get into those here) 2. Non-recycling pool (`nonRecyclingPool()`): basically, "no-op" implementation that does not recycle anything. 3. Concurrent Dequeue-based pool (shared / per-factory) 4. Lock-free pool (shared / per-factory) 5. Bounded pool (shared (size 100) / per-factory) Of these (1) and (2) are not relevant; leaving 3, 4 or 5. Beyond choice of implementation there is also the question of whether to default to single ("shared") global pool (which should be more memory-efficient but could lead to contention) or per-factory instance. 3 and 4 are also unbounded, in the sense that they can grow to sizes based on maximum concurrent buffer usage (so typically some multiple of # of threads); whereas 5 is bounded to specific size. My initial thinking is to use a per-factory Bounded pool, to avoid unbounded buffer retention; but then again per-factory lock-free pool (4) might be a good option. So... I would like to hear opinions, suggestions on the choice here. Vast majority of users will simply use the default we choose so the choice matters quite a bit. -+ Tatu +- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jackson-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-dev/CAL4a10jHOTmMR9cSgyAjLKAJu4HMWRhdQ2UZJE9_Au2LLkWrgA%40mail.gmail.com.