Thank you

Il giorno ven 2 nov 2018 alle 22:22 Tatu Saloranta <[email protected]> ha
scritto:

>
> Use method `path()` instead (or, if you want to create missing object,
> `with()`); it works that way.
>
> Semantics of `get()` are such that `null` is returned; and changing
> that would break thousands of users everywhere (code that checks for
> `null` to mean "isn't there"), so that is absolutely not going to
> happen (for 2.x at least).
> For 3.x it is possible to discuss naming, semantics, but it may not be
> worth the hassle to change method names even there.
>
-- 
Federico Fissore
Blog - http://www.fissore.org
Jabber - [email protected]

"The best thing is when you mix free beer and free speech 'cause then you
get some really free speech"
      Dick Wall

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jackson-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to