On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 1:27 AM Marc Dzaebel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Tatu,
>
> good to know about both alternatives. I'll use you recommendation, the
> wrapper. I also found it on SO here
> <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/23172718/how-to-make-polymorphic-jackson-serialization-working-with-map>,
> where they used the old/deprecaded mapper.writerWithType()
>

Right, `writerWithType()` was renamed as `writerFor()`.

-+ Tatu +-



> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "jackson-user" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-user/b401bc11-8ead-48d2-9684-335ac02d60fb%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-user/b401bc11-8ead-48d2-9684-335ac02d60fb%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jackson-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-user/CAGrxA24MU1Yd%3DS8Ph71%2Bagrbgp-c9L9192WbWhTO8J88E91yXQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to