Got it, you'll have to write a custom deserializer, then:
https://www.baeldung.com/jackson-deserialization 

-Drew

On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 2:19:31 PM UTC-4 [email protected] wrote:

> Hi drewgs, yeah that is one option .But thing is in that I can't do 
> anything, because that Json is coming from other service. And I can't do 
> any manipulations in that service  .So I have to do something here only to 
> get this LocalDateTime form  deserialized.
>
> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 11:39:40 PM UTC+5:30 [email protected] 
> wrote:
>
>> You'll need to add the JSR-310 module to the program that is creating 
>> that JSON.
>>
>> -Drew
>>
>> On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 6:27:37 AM UTC-4 [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The default jackson serialization of LocalDateTime is the format which I 
>>> had sended above, so why  it doesn't deserializing the same format. Can 
>>> there be some dependency or annotations which can take care of this?
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 2:25:51 AM UTC+5:30 [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 9:33 AM kaushik tiwari <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all, I m facing LocalDateTimeDeserialization issue,gone through 
>>>>> with various blogs but didn't found the solution which can work for me.
>>>>> Added JSR310 dependency as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> *Json which I want to get deserialized is in this form: *
>>>>> {"year":2018,"month":
>>>>> "JULY","monthValue":7,"dayOfMonth":20,"hour":20,"minute":3,"second":33,"nano":653000000,"dayOfWeek":"FRIDAY","dayOfYear":201,"chronology":{"calendarType":"iso8601","id":"ISO"}}}
>>>>>   
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That is not a format that JSR-310 module supports for `LocalDateTime`, 
>>>> so it will not work without a custom deserializer of some kind.
>>>> It looks like someone serializing LocalDateTime without using jsr310 
>>>> module, and it getting treated as POJO.
>>>> You could either write a custom JsonDeserializer or, maybe, create a 
>>>> POJO that maps those fields and then write code to construct matching 
>>>> value 
>>>> instance (actually that would be similar to `Converter` and 
>>>> `StdConvertingDeserializer` approach).
>>>>
>>>> -+ Tatu +-
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jackson-user" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-user/07a52298-849e-431a-8dfb-5dee1c59ec72n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to