On 2021-09-11T21:19:15 -0700
Tatu Saloranta <t...@fasterxml.com> wrote:
>
> The main (or initial?) problem here is just that type LocationID is
> taken to be a POJO with properties (since Records by definition are),
> instead of something behaving like String value. The issue is that
> POJOs cannot be serialized as attributes but only as elements.
> In theory it is possible to annotate Records to work like Strings,
> too, but it might be easier to first try to create equivalent "simple"
> pojo with
> something like:
>
> static class LocationId {
> private UUID id;
>
> @JsonCreator(mode = JsonCreator.Mode.DELEGATING)
> public LocationId(UUID id) { this.id = id; }
>
> @JsonValue // method name can be anything
> protected UUID id() { return id; }
> }
>
> which should then serialize as a basic String value, and deserialized
> similarly from a String value.It works! Thank you! Will records get some kind of special handling post JDK 17? I often use these kind of wrappers for extra type safety, and it's a shame that they can't be expressed as records in this case. -- Mark Raynsford | https://www.io7m.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jackson-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jackson-user+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jackson-user/20210912082957.5c6dd0f2%40sunflower.int.arc7.info.
pgpYOMfz0Tc9H.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
