By combining reports i mean merging all .exec files into one .exec file and then producing an overall report from that file.
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Mariam Rajabi <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh this thing compares two exec files and shows their associated reports > side by side, if that's what you mean by combining reports. > > On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Mani Sarkar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks for the tip - i'm still looking for something that combines >> reports as well. >> >> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Mariam Rajabi < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Mani, >>> >>> I have this project on GitHub which generates a comparison report for >>> two .exec files. https://github.com/mariamr/Jacoco-Comparison-Tool >>> I think you can extend/modify it to do more analysis on exec files. >>> >>> Mariam >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Mani Sarkar <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It still would be nice to be able to plug into JaCoCo's report runner >>>> and re-analyse the merged .exec files during the analysis or offline. Has >>>> anyone done any maven or Java work on this? >>>> >>>> I know there was a pull request created with this feature long ago but >>>> not sure what happened to the feature if it found its way into JaCoCo, see >>>> https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/pull/97. >>>> >>>> Honestly I think the append property is partially useful, as it helps >>>> merge the exec files but not update the reports to reflect just that? >>>> >>>> Any other ideas to merge it will be great, I did see the one where Ant >>>> tasks are used but I find it too verbose for a pom.xml file. >>>> >>>> On Friday, 25 October 2013 03:42:47 UTC+1, [email protected] >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> I'm running multiple sets of test cases on a single package. As >>>>> expected, after running Jacoco , it generates an individual report for >>>>> each >>>>> set. However I would like to find a way to aggregate the generated >>>>> report >>>>> files, in that I can have a final report including the coverage percentage >>>>> for all of the test cases, so that I can tell which test case has a better >>>>> coverage for the package. Is there any way that I can do this? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> @theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>* | **Blog >> <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate >> (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) >> *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector >> <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket >> <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github >> <https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * | **LinkedIn >> <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>* >> *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ >> >> *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come >> chasing after you!* >> > > -- @theNeomatrix369 <http://twitter.com/theNeomatrix369>* | **Blog <http://neomatrix369.wordpress.com>** | *LJC Associate & LJC Advocate (@adoptopenjdk & @adoptajsr programs) *Meet-a-Project - *MutabilityDetector <https://github.com/MutabilityDetector>* | **Bitbucket <https://bitbucket.org/neomatrix369>* * | **Github <https://github.com/neomatrix369>* * | **LinkedIn <http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/mani-sarkar/71/a77/39b>* *Come to Devoxx UK 2015:* http://www.devoxx.co.uk/ *Don't chase success, rather aim for "Excellence", and success will come chasing after you!* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo and EclEmma Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/CAGHtMW%3DDkHfU8i6hXBRPpov3Mq3gxUZuz9owcgN9PQYz0Uv2DA%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
