Hi,
exclusion of dynamically generated classes only applies to runtime. For
report generation these classes have never been shown. So I don't think
this causes the difference.
When you compare both reports please drill down to a specific class
where you see differences and show differences here (e.g. with
screenshots).
Regards,
-marc
On 2016-10-21 00:05, [email protected] wrote:
When doing on-the-fly instrumentation and reporting on the same
code/test run I noticed that the coverage % dropped starting in JaCoCo
0.7.3. It seem like it was due to a new feature that excluded
dynamically generated classes. Is there an option to disable this
feature? If not I will be stuck using 0.7.2. Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo
and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/2c78e90375a3ab30befd6a7a626c8529%40mountainminds.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
