Hi,
the short circuit results in two separate branching points each
containing two branches, so 2+2=4.
You can rewrite the line as
if (0 <= i) if (i < 10)
This is how short circuits expressions get compiled and how JaCoCo sees it.
Regards,
-marc
On 28.03.17 05:04, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
I have a condition that looks something like this:
if(0 <= i && i < 10)
The coverage report shows 1 of 4 branches missed. I can't expect JaCoCo to
recognize the semantics of the condition which make it impossible to reach the
fourth branch (i can't be both less than 0 and greater than 10), but why
doesn't it just count 3 branches? Thanks to short-circuiting, if the first
decision is false, it shouldn't matter what the second one is.
Thanks,
Cassidy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JaCoCo
and EclEmma Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jacoco/14b991db-d6af-8871-0e8a-2242751017f1%40mountainminds.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
