On 06.07.2016 11:28, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2016-07-05 20:49, Valentine Sinitsyn wrote:
[...]
The expected behavior would be not to remap these entries, of course.
However, they aren't masked (which is what I'd expect), and adding
another "address != 0" check seems like a hack.
We are pretty strict right now with the configuration migration during
jailhouse enable. We could relax that, only warn about "blocking invalid
vector X of device Y", do not configure a route and continue. When a
Yes, this makes sense - probably I'll implement this. Do you think a
BIOS update could fix the issue on this particular board (haven't tried
yet)?
Valentine
guest actively programs such things later on, failing is likely still
better (because that would be a guest bug, or worse).
Jan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Jailhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
