On 2017-04-27 23:33, Benjamin Lindqvist wrote: > I've been looking at Jailhouse for running Linux and a RTOS on the same > device. While doing some research on the subject, I found two other projects > that attempts to do something very similar (i.e. complete resource > isolation), namely the "offline scheduler" (https://lwn.net/Articles/350123/) > and "CPU isolation extensions" (https://lwn.net/Articles/268711/). > > Neither of these projects seem to be currently maintained and interest seems > to be pretty low. But when Jailhouse was announced, the reactions seemed > incredibly positive. I'm wondering if anyone can explain/point me to a > reference explaining the fundamental upsides in using Jailhouse as opposed to > something based on cpu affinity + irq disabling? >
The approaches you cite above depend on the Linux kernel during runtime. Jailhouse only uses Linux as a bootloader but isolates the CPUs and I/O resources independently of Linux while in operational mode. That allows for stricter isolation and a much smaller trusted code base, which specifically useful safety critical scenarios. It also enable asymmetric architectures where the isolated cores run something else than Linux (e.g. in legacy migration scenarios). Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RDA ITP SES-DE Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jailhouse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
