On Tuesday 05 September 2017 11:56 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2017-08-30 12:34, 'Lokesh Vutla' via Jailhouse wrote:
>> Even though 'struct sgi' already supports for passing affinity levels,
>> gic_handle_sgir_write() looks only for target fields and triggers sgis
>> to its respective targets. This will fail in case of armv8 with affinity
>> routing enabled. So parse all the affinity levels in sgi before sending
>> sgi.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  hypervisor/arch/arm-common/irqchip.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/arm-common/irqchip.c 
>> b/hypervisor/arch/arm-common/irqchip.c
>> index 2019342..64c081d 100644
>> --- a/hypervisor/arch/arm-common/irqchip.c
>> +++ b/hypervisor/arch/arm-common/irqchip.c
>> @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ void gic_handle_sgir_write(struct sgi *sgi, bool 
>> virt_input)
>>      struct per_cpu *cpu_data = this_cpu_data();
>>      unsigned long targets = sgi->targets;
>>      unsigned int cpu;
>> +    u64 mpidr, clst, sgi_clst, core;
> 
> Let's write this out: cluster.

okay.

> 
>>  
>>      if (sgi->routing_mode == 2) {
>>              /* Route to the caller itself */
>> @@ -139,14 +140,23 @@ void gic_handle_sgir_write(struct sgi *sgi, bool 
>> virt_input)
>>              sgi->targets = (1 << cpu_data->cpu_id);
>>      } else {
>>              sgi->targets = 0;
>> +            sgi_clst = (u64)sgi->aff3 << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(3) |
>> +                            (u64)sgi->aff2 << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(2) |
>> +                            (u64)sgi->aff1 << MPIDR_LEVEL_SHIFT(1);
> 
> I wonder if we shouldn't refactor the sgi structure and encode the
> cluster information in it via a single field that is encoded like mpidr.
> That may save us from juggling with the aff1..3 fields all the time.

After think a bit, I do not see any issue replacing aff[123] with
cluster_id and store the value as "mpidr && ~0xffUL"? Will try to make
changes and repost the entire series.

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh


> 
>>  
>>              for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_data->cell->cpu_set) {
>> +                    mpidr = per_cpu(cpu)->mpidr;
>> +                    clst = mpidr & ~0xffUL;
>> +                    core = MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL(mpidr, 0);
>> +
>> +
>>                      if (sgi->routing_mode == 1) {
>>                              /* Route to all (cell) CPUs but the caller. */
>>                              if (cpu == cpu_data->cpu_id)
>>                                      continue;
>>                      } else if (virt_input) {
>> -                            if (!test_bit(cpu, &targets))
>> +                            if (sgi_clst != clst ||
>> +                                !test_bit(core, &targets))
>>                                      continue;
>>                      } else {
>>                              /*
>> @@ -161,7 +171,7 @@ void gic_handle_sgir_write(struct sgi *sgi, bool 
>> virt_input)
>>                      }
>>  
>>                      irqchip_set_pending(per_cpu(cpu), sgi->id);
>> -                    sgi->targets |= (1 << cpu);
>> +                    sgi->targets |= (1 << core);
>>              }
>>      }
>>  
>>
> 
> Jan
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jailhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to