Am Wed, 2 May 2018 08:43:10 +0200 schrieb Jan Kiszka <[email protected]>:
> Hi all, > > there is currently a large set of almost 50 patches in next (I kept it > longer there to provide more time for reviews). Ralf just suggested > ~20 further patches for inmates refactorings. And there a couple of > smaller changes pending or promised. > > But then I'm hacking on almost 70 patches now that enable per-cpu page > tables and do a lot of refactoring around that, changes all across the > hypervisor. So I feel like we should set a tag before that starts to > hit the tree. > > IOW: v0.9 is upcoming. It's just about defining what we should put in > and what should be left for v0.10 (I'm not expecting to reach 1.0 with > the next-but-one step). IMHO: > > - next should go in (still time to review and test now!) > - from Ralf's work, at least some Communication Region revision field > should be merged (to be written, still) > - maybe the rest of his patches as well, to be seen after round 2 > - FF's man pages should go in (/me needs to look into installation if > no one else does that...) > - Peng's fix for parange (waiting for the patches, though) > - Henning's address prefix patch (once proven to work with all > supported instructions) > > Anything I forgot? If all goes well, we could release somewhere mid of > next week. I could have another go at the arm ivshmem example, if that sound like something for 0.9. Henning > Jan > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jailhouse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
