On 03.12.20 16:23, Andrea Bastoni wrote:
> On 03/12/2020 14:44, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 03.12.20 13:48, Andrea Bastoni wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2020 07:36, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 27.11.20 12:41, Andrea Bastoni wrote:
>>>>> The SMMUv2 allows filtering bits when matching stream IDs before they're
>>>>> passed to the TCU. In this way multiple streams legally get the same
>>>>> translation.
>>>>>
>>>>> On boards such as the ZCU Ultrascale+, the master ID needed to identify
>>>>> the corresponding SMMU stream ID may be dependent on a specific AXI ID
>>>>> that is set by the PL (and could be IP specific).
>>>>>
>>>>> One single fixed mask to pass to the SMR to compact multiple stream IDs
>>>>> before they "hit" the TCU is not flexible enough. The use-case is to
>>>>> compact similar PL-originating masters and have the SMMU behaving the
>>>>> same for them (e.g., they're assigned to the same inmate). At the
>>>>> same time, one needs a full stream_id to assign e.g., different GEM
>>>>> ethernets to different inmates.
>>>>>
>>>>> Update a stream_id to support two different interpretations:
>>>>> - for the SMMUv2, provide an explicit mask + ID.
>>>>> - for the SMMUv3, keep the current single ID.
>>>>>
>>>>> This commit updates the SMMUv2 / v3 --including configuration--
>>>>> accordingly.
>>>>
>>>> CC'ing Nikil and Peng on their affected code.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrea Bastoni <[email protected]>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  configs/arm64/imx8qm-linux-demo.c       |  7 ++-
>>>>>  configs/arm64/imx8qm.c                  | 16 +++++--
>>>>>  configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm-linux-demo.c |  2 +-
>>>>>  configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm.c            |  2 +-
>>>>>  configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm-linux-demo.c |  2 +-
>>>>>  configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm.c            |  2 +-
>>>>>  configs/arm64/ultra96.c                 | 11 ++++-
>>>>>  configs/arm64/zynqmp-zcu102.c           | 15 +++++-
>>>>>  hypervisor/arch/arm64/smmu-v3.c         |  9 ++--
>>>>>  hypervisor/arch/arm64/smmu.c            | 64 ++++++++++++++++---------
>>>>>  hypervisor/arch/arm64/ti-pvu.c          | 21 ++++----
>>>>>  include/jailhouse/cell-config.h         | 18 ++++---
>>>>>  12 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/configs/arm64/imx8qm-linux-demo.c 
>>>>> b/configs/arm64/imx8qm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> index f13ca7bc..e8e8b217 100644
>>>>> --- a/configs/arm64/imx8qm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> +++ b/configs/arm64/imx8qm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ struct {
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_memory mem_regions[18];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[4];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_pci_device pci_devices[2];
>>>>> - __u32 stream_ids[1];
>>>>> + union jailhouse_stream_id stream_ids[1];
>>>>>  } __attribute__((packed)) config = {
>>>>>   .cell = {
>>>>>           .signature = JAILHOUSE_CELL_DESC_SIGNATURE,
>>>>> @@ -194,6 +194,9 @@ struct {
>>>>>   },
>>>>>  
>>>>>   .stream_ids = {
>>>>> -         0x10,
>>>>> +         {
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.mask = 0x7f8,
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.id = 0x10,
>>>>
>>>> Would list id before the mask.
>>>>
>>>>> +         },
>>>>>   },
>>>>>  };
>>>>> diff --git a/configs/arm64/imx8qm.c b/configs/arm64/imx8qm.c
>>>>> index d63c73cf..2ec4f4dd 100644
>>>>> --- a/configs/arm64/imx8qm.c
>>>>> +++ b/configs/arm64/imx8qm.c
>>>>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ struct {
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_memory mem_regions[15];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[3];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_pci_device pci_devices[2];
>>>>> - __u32 stream_ids[3];
>>>>> + union jailhouse_stream_id stream_ids[3];
>>>>>  } __attribute__((packed)) config = {
>>>>>   .header = {
>>>>>           .signature = JAILHOUSE_SYSTEM_SIGNATURE,
>>>>> @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ struct {
>>>>>                                   .type = JAILHOUSE_IOMMU_ARM_MMU500,
>>>>>                                   .base = 0x51400000,
>>>>>                                   .size = 0x40000,
>>>>> -                                 .arm_mmu500.sid_mask = 0x7f80,
>>>>>                           },
>>>>>                   },
>>>>>  
>>>>> @@ -209,6 +208,17 @@ struct {
>>>>>   },
>>>>>  
>>>>>   .stream_ids = {
>>>>> -         0x11, 0x12, 0x13,
>>>>> +         {
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.mask = 0x7f8,
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.id = 0x11,
>>>>> +         },
>>>>> +         {
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.mask = 0x7f8,
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.id = 0x12,
>>>>> +         },
>>>>> +         {
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.mask = 0x7f8,
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.id = 0x13,
>>>>> +         },
>>>>>   },
>>>>>  };
>>>>> diff --git a/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm-linux-demo.c 
>>>>> b/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> index 90a0ce4c..ace9cd3a 100644
>>>>> --- a/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> +++ b/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ struct {
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_memory mem_regions[19];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[3];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_pci_device pci_devices[2];
>>>>> - __u32 stream_ids[1];
>>>>> + union jailhouse_stream_id stream_ids[1];
>>>>>  } __attribute__((packed)) config = {
>>>>>   .cell = {
>>>>>           .signature = JAILHOUSE_CELL_DESC_SIGNATURE,
>>>>> diff --git a/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm.c b/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm.c
>>>>> index c3ac331d..d0c8aee3 100644
>>>>> --- a/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm.c
>>>>> +++ b/configs/arm64/k3-j7200-evm.c
>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct {
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_memory mem_regions[32];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[6];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_pci_device pci_devices[2];
>>>>> - __u32 stream_ids[1];
>>>>> + union jailhouse_stream_id stream_ids[1];
>>>>>  } __attribute__((packed)) config = {
>>>>>   .header = {
>>>>>           .signature = JAILHOUSE_SYSTEM_SIGNATURE,
>>>>> diff --git a/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm-linux-demo.c 
>>>>> b/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> index 5b6aa82e..1b8b3c4c 100644
>>>>> --- a/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> +++ b/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm-linux-demo.c
>>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct {
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_memory mem_regions[22];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[4];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_pci_device pci_devices[2];
>>>>> - __u32 stream_ids[2];
>>>>> + union jailhouse_stream_id stream_ids[2];
>>>>>  } __attribute__((packed)) config = {
>>>>>   .cell = {
>>>>>           .signature = JAILHOUSE_CELL_DESC_SIGNATURE,
>>>>> diff --git a/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm.c b/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm.c
>>>>> index ab13fedd..aa5b47a9 100644
>>>>> --- a/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm.c
>>>>> +++ b/configs/arm64/k3-j721e-evm.c
>>>>> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct {
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_memory mem_regions[40];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[6];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_pci_device pci_devices[2];
>>>>> - __u32 stream_ids[30];
>>>>> + union jailhouse_stream_id stream_ids[30];
>>>>>  } __attribute__((packed)) config = {
>>>>>   .header = {
>>>>>           .signature = JAILHOUSE_SYSTEM_SIGNATURE,
>>>>> diff --git a/configs/arm64/ultra96.c b/configs/arm64/ultra96.c
>>>>> index db65ae01..19be84ae 100644
>>>>> --- a/configs/arm64/ultra96.c
>>>>> +++ b/configs/arm64/ultra96.c
>>>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ struct {
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_memory mem_regions[11];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_irqchip irqchips[1];
>>>>>   struct jailhouse_pci_device pci_devices[2];
>>>>> - __u32 stream_ids[2];
>>>>> + union jailhouse_stream_id stream_ids[2];
>>>>>  } __attribute__((packed)) config = {
>>>>>   .header = {
>>>>>           .signature = JAILHOUSE_SYSTEM_SIGNATURE,
>>>>> @@ -161,6 +161,13 @@ struct {
>>>>>   },
>>>>>  
>>>>>   .stream_ids = {
>>>>> -         0x870, 0x871
>>>>> +         {
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.mask = 0x0,
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.id = 0x870,
>>>>> +         },
>>>>> +         {
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.mask = 0x0,
>>>>> +                 .mmu500.id = 0x871,
>>>>
>>>> Only realizing now: That mask is an "ignore mask", right? Bits set there
>>>> are NOT matched against the id. That's modeled after the hardware? Is
>>>> this really intuitive? This one confused me at least.
>>>
>>> Yes, it is model after the hardware. Maybe "ignore_mask" or "imask" would 
>>> be better?
>>>
>>
>> ...r invert it in SMR_GET_MASK? Not sure what is nicer. The latter has
> 
> Not sure what you mean by "...r" ? "maskr"?

"...or invert" - I somehow lost the "o".

> 
>> the disadvantage that you then always need to specify a non-zero mask.
> 
> Not sure that inverting it in SMR_GET_MASK is very nice. The mask is 15 bits,
> the "consider all" would be 0x7fff (and you start wondering in the 
> configuration
> why 7 and not f...)
> 
> What about "mask_out"?
> 

Shorter and still clear - let's go for that.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, T RDA IOT
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jailhouse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jailhouse-dev/9e5869e4-8f93-a0d0-7758-87ba610bd626%40siemens.com.

Reply via email to