On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> >
> > Geir, you seemed happy with Repository. Is that still
> > the case? I'm willing to change the name to
> > Repository, unless there are other supporters of
> > Commons Proper, in which case we'll vote. I'm not
> > married to Commons Proper, I just don't like the name
> > Components. The whole project is about components.
> > I'm a little hesitant about Repository, since the
> > Sandbox is also a repository, but I think it's clear
> > enough.
>
> I like repository, but am waiting to hear what others think.
>
Repository is fine, but I didn't really have any problem with
Components. Originally I had thought about "Packages", but there won't
always be a 1:1 correspondence with the Java notion of a Package.
> And I don't think of sandbox as a 'repository' as it's unorganized.
>
Sandbox is a experimental playpen, with no distinguishable individual
contents. In fact, the guidelines say it should not be available to the
public, either -- should we remove the anonymous CVS link to it that I
created by habit?
> >
> > Clarity is key. We have to pretend we haven't been
> > discussing these issues for months and look at the
> > organization of the project with a critical eye.
>
> +1
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
>
Craig
