Re: Finding "build.properties" Files

[Jim Cheesman]

At 06:34 PM 4/16/2001, you wrote:
>"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
>I understand that.  What I meant was since we can specify it easily and
>clearly in the build.xml, the name 'build.properties' is a nice, clear,
>expressive-of-purpose name, rather than  .ant.properties, which novice
>unix users might have trouble finding, and the Windows pointy-clicky
>crowd can't create :)


Why make things more difficult than necessary? "build.properties" seems to 
be the way to go (to me at least).


Salu2
Jim





--

                           *   Jim Cheesman   *
             Trabajo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (34)(91) 724 9200 x 2360
               Personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (34) 606 770 244
              Practice safe eating -- always use condiments.