Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package

[Scott Sanders]

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> "Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
> 
>> One nitpick along with my +1 -- the property setting stuff relies on the
>> code that is now in "beanutils" in Commons already.
>> 
> 
> 
> Would it make any sense to move it into beanutils?

I am fine with that.  It is in a sense some generic jav object 
manipulation routines.  Since it will use beanutils' code, the release 
jar makes sense to include both for digester, but what about the other 
way around?

Scott Sanders