Jeff,
I took a quick look at the XMLUnit stuff in SourceForge. It looks good, and
not incompatible with what I at least was thinking about the XMLUnit stuff
in the sandbox.
It looks like your stuff focuses mainly on comparisons of two complete XML
documents (provided in one or more forms--String, Reader, etc.) as
equal/not-equal--not unlike the "golden" tests Watchdog uses. The
XMLTestCase code in the sandbox currently focuses on looking for/at aspects
of XML documents using XPath, e.g., this document has a "para" tag within a
"div" tag with an attribute named "alignment" or this node has three
children, etc. I imagined XMLUnit doing both.
It looks like you're the only committer for XMLUnit at sourceforge. Like
Morgan said, if you've had other contributors you'll want to talk to them
before moving their code, but if you're interested, I'm sure we'd be able to
get you approved as a jakarta-commons committer and you could port your
stuff over.
- R
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 2:12 PM
To: Jakarta-Commons@Jakarta. Apache. Org (E-mail)
Subject: XMLUnit
Hi, I've just subscribed to this list so I'm not really up on what's going
on at the moment but I just thought I'd mention this.
I've noticed the XMLUnit project and it struck me that it's very similar to
a project which I started not long ago called XMLUnit ;o) Looks like there
doing pretty much the same thing but from different ends I've been doing
asserts against whole XML documents rather than each node.
Thought it would make sense to try and pool ideas. My code's in sourceforge
at the moment http://sourceforge.net/projects/xmlunit/ Best place to look
cvs as there's been a couple of fixes since the first release.
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/xmlunit
module name is cvs
