A minor point: In 1.5 you say
"HTTP Client relies on:
Java Development Kit (Version 1.1 or later; 1.3 or later
recommended)"
How can you recommend a JDK that isn't yet published? Perhaps 1.4 will
be a bad JDK.
So I'd say, drop the "or later" and just state "1.3 recommended".
Un saludo,
Alex.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose the HTTP client library as a commons component. The
> detailed proposal is attached to this email (unless it somehow get stripped
> by the mailing list manager), and it's also available at :
> http://jakarta.apache.org/cvsweb/index.cgi/~checkout~/jakarta-commons-sandbo
> x/httpclient/PROPOSAL.html?rev=1.3&content-type=text/plain
>
> The component name will be httpclient.
>
> Remy
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: PROPOSAL.html
> PROPOSAL.html Type: Hypertext Markup Language (text/html)
> Encoding: quoted-printable
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Scott Sanders
- [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Remy Maucherat
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Vincent Massol
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package cmanolache
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library package Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] HTTP client library packa... Remy Maucherat
- [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a commons c... Remy Maucherat
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Scott Sanders
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as... Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Alex Fern�ndez
- RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as... Mike Braden
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library packag... Alex Fern�ndez
- RE: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Mike Braden
- Re: [VOTE] HTTP client library package as a c... Vincent Massol
- RE: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Waldhoff, Rodney
- RE: [PROPOSAL/VOTE] Digester Package Waldhoff, Rodney
