+1 for commons-dev for the current jakarta-commons list.
Now that we've started actually releasing things (thanks to Vincent :-),
we should go ahead and create commons-user at the same time.
In the future, I wouldn't be surprised at all to see a cactus-user list
...
Craig
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peter Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 9:01 AM
> Subject: Mailing list name??
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noticed that the mailing list name is still jakarta-commons. This is
> > different in convention from all the jakarta, xml (and other) apache
> > project mailing lists. I know there was discussion about this but nothing
> > seemed to have happened. Unless there is a signmificant advantage for
> going
> > against convention I would liek to suggest either commons-dev or commons
> as
> > mailing list names (jakarta is redundent as host is jakarta). It shouldn't
> > effect current users of list and if we want we could set up an alias to
> > redirect jakarta-commons to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thoughts?
> >
>
> As long as there is redirect for existing users I'm fine.
> I actually tend to prefer a shorter name ...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems the best one until we decide to have 2
> lists : -dev and -user
> So, if this is the cost for being compliant with the conventions I'm +1 !
>
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Pete
> Thanks,
> Vincent
>
>
