Hi folks!
You know, I'm getting a bit nervous. Nobody answered to this mail, and
nobody commented on the code I sent. Still, I get messages from commons
alright, so it must be that either:
- code and classification were incontrovertibly true, set on stone, the
final truth;
- or they were deemed irrelevant and discarded;
- or they were so long that people are still reading them;
- or a combination where one of them was in one of the previous cases
and the other in another.
Anyways, I'd like to know whether the code will be used, to make up and
insert the proper header in every class (license enforcement, you might
say). I don't care about the classification, since we use it around here
and it works alright; but I'd like to hear your comments.
At least there is one advocate of the Old English logo (thanks
Lavandowska! You rock! :)
Un saludo,
Alex.
Alex Fern�ndez wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent!
>
> I think your classification is well thought, but you engrain the test
> method inside each category. As a matter of fact, we use mock objects
> for functional testing, what you call '3: end to end tests'; and it
> should be possible to use different test methods for every category.
>
> What follows is a (long!) description of our current testing
> methodology, or at least our part in it; acceptance tests are the
> responsibility of the customer, and they usually do it manually. We
> don't do EJB's, since we have no EJB container.
