On 7/31/01 1:11 AM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like us to vote on releasing version 1.0 of the HTTP Client component.
>
> As appeared to be generally agreed upon, HTTP client shouldn't have
> dependencies with log4j
I don't really have anything to do with httpclient so I'm not
going to go against what you wish but how are we going to
deal with logging in all the commons components?
I actually don't mind the dependency on log4j.
> (Rodney, do you plan to revert that part of your
> latest patch ?), so this proposal is based on the current CVS with the log4j
> patch being reverted.
>
> There are many features which could (and probably will) be added to the HTTP
> client, but I think many people (including myself, since the Slide WebDAV
> client is an extension of this HTTP client) need a stable version on which
> they could base their work on.
>
> HTTP Client 1.0 release ballot :
> [ ] +1 I am in favor of this release and will help
> [ ] +0 I am in favor of this release, but am unable to help
+0
> [ ] -0 I am not in favor of this release, and my reason is:
>
> (Note: There's no -1 in the ballot, since vetoing a release is not allowed
> under normal circumstances - please correct me if I'm wrong)
>
> Remy
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
