logging again (was RE: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client 1.0 release)That's
what the sandbox is for, no?
Scott
----- Original Message -----
From: Waldhoff, Rodney
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: logging again (was RE: [httpclient] [VOTE] HTTP client 1.0 release)
> Is it planned to suggest to other commons components to
> try to have a similar behavior ?
>
> Remy
Yeah, I've got the same question.
It seems to me that if we're happy with this approach then we'll probably
want to use it in some of the other components (cache and dbcp both seem
like reasonable candidates for logging for example). If that's the case,
then we certain don't want to reproduce this code (and this packaging)
everywhere (otherwise our Log impls won't be interoperable across
components). So what do we do? Purpose what's currently in the
httpclient.log package as a distinct commons package? Try to lobby the
log4j folks to produce a similar Log/Category abstraction that is
distributed in a tiny jar? I lean toward the latter but I don't know how
hard that will be or how long that would take. Perhaps a commons package is
the way to go in the short run?
