On 8/8/01 8:28 PM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Morgan Delagrange wrote:
>>
>> Arguably, but it's already code that's used in a
>> Commons component, and I have karma here. Anyway,
>> we'll know soon enough whether to keep it or not.
>
> That fact that you have karma has nothing to do with it. The point of
> the sandbox is to incubate projects, and then bring them to a vote such
> that they are then put into commons.
I agree 100%. The project should have been placed in the sandbox because no
one has agreed that it is a commons project and people checking out the
repository might assume that it is which is not the case.
If it is not stated clearly in the charter than I think that a new project
has to go through the same process, even if it consists mainly of code that
was taken from another commons project.
> I don't see why you don't want to respect that convention.
>
> geir
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
http://tambora.zenplex.org
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine
http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity
http://jakarta.apache.org/alexandria
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons
