Scott Sanders wrote:
>
> Excellent. Then we have no worries ;-)
>
> Geir,
> I am assuming that jjar has overtaken cjan in the functionality department,
> so I am willing to see cjan go out the window. The only other intention of
> CJAN was to actually be an xml project descriptor/jar repository on
> jakarta.apache.org. Are you intending to do something like this?
:) You were the one that convinced me of the error of my ways (along
with Sams Brooks reference, and Jasons note about a tiny XML parser...)
> I am
> willing to work on that piece, such that jjar just asks the repoitory up on
> the website for the jars, and gets them down locally. Or you point to gump,
> and get them from there. Or even another repoistory.
That's how it works now. I didn't put the original repository on
jakarta.apache.org, but on another public machine I control. (I didn't
want to be presumptuous...)
I will move things to jakarta tomorrow.
>
> Is this the direction in which you were headed with jjar?
>
A lot of it is there. The question is how gump and jjar can share repo
info, and if we can get jjar, after it matures a bit and we understand
the use-cases, into ant.
geir
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software Consulting
Developing for the web? See http://jakarta.apache.org/velocity/
Well done is better than well said - New England Proverb
