Scott Sanders wrote: > > Why are we holding an *unreleased* commons component to a higher > standard of stability than anything else? (1) Because they are common. Presumed to be a core dependency shared amoungst multiple projects. (2) Why do you assume that this is a higher standard than other components? Ask Conor or Ceki or Geir or Peter (or on the XML side Shane or Arved or...). Generally it is my intention to bring changes that they make which may break compatibility to their attention within 24 hours from the time the commit has been made. That's provem to be much more effective than simply waiting for the next release. - Sam Ruby
