Rodney Waldhoff wrote:
> If the goal is logging, I'd suggest we use logging. If the goal is event
> publication, I'd suggest we set up a more meaningful events (the auth
> credentials is one of the smaller points), and a more meaningful way of
> responding to those events. I appreciate the concepts behind these
> interceptors, but I think they need a little more work to be truly useful,
> and if we don't have a strong need for them now, maybe we can defer that
> work for a 1.1 or 2.0 release.
>
> More to the point though, I was trying to reintroduce these interfaces into
> the branch I've been working on, and it is not clear to me what the contract
> with these interfaces is supposed to be. And if the contract isn't clear
> from looking at the HttpClient internals, it's certainly not clear to
> someone who wants to implement those interfaces.
You changed the HttpClient to connect to many servers, the original HttpClient
was more like your HttpConnection and then the interfaces are good I think.
I'm not really using them so I won't object a removal but maybe somebody else
uses them.
I don't like logging in components and would like to see the StreamInterceptor
back in a future release.
What features are going in version 1.0 and when can we expect it ?
Dirk
