> > client are in fact using the HTTP client underneath. Changing its API
> would
> > introduce API changes to the WebDAV part too. So the move to 2.0 would
> only
> > happen in Slide 2.0, which isn't even planned yet (that probably means
> more
> > than a year). So to meet our needs, we have to mantain the 1.x branch
for
> a
> > while, and that probably means there would be a few feature additions in
> the
> > meantime.
> >
> > Remy
>
> I don't see anything in the proposal preventing this. As the maintainer,
> you can make as many or as few changes to the 1.x branch as you like. It
> seems like most people are interested in the 2.0 design, but Slide clearly
> needs the 1.0 interface, since it is exposed by the API. Vincent's
proposal
> seems like a very reasonable compromise.
I probably don't need to introduce major changes, though. Mostly
maintenance, with the occational new WebDAV oriented feature (like digest
auth support).
Remy
